Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 70
Filter
1.
arxiv; 2023.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-ARXIV | ID: ppzbmed-2311.13724v1

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need to upgrade systems for infectious disease surveillance and forecasting and modeling of the spread of infection, both of which inform evidence-based public health guidance and policies. Here, we discuss requirements for an effective surveillance system to support decision making during a pandemic, drawing on the lessons of COVID-19 in the U.S., while looking to jurisdictions in the U.S. and beyond to learn lessons about the value of specific data types. In this report, we define the range of decisions for which surveillance data are required, the data elements needed to inform these decisions and to calibrate inputs and outputs of transmission-dynamic models, and the types of data needed to inform decisions by state, territorial, local, and tribal health authorities. We define actions needed to ensure that such data will be available and consider the contribution of such efforts to improving health equity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
2.
Can Fam Physician ; 69(5): 369, 2023 05.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2324547
3.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 2022 Sep 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2325555

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Available evidence is mixed concerning associations between smoking status and COVID-19 clinical outcomes. Effects of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and vaccination status on COVID-19 outcomes in smokers are unknown. METHODS: Electronic health record data from 104 590 COVID-19 patients hospitalized February 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021 in 21 U.S. health systems were analyzed to assess associations of smoking status, in-hospital NRT prescription, and vaccination status with in-hospital death and ICU admission. RESULTS: Current (n = 7764) and never smokers (n = 57 454) did not differ on outcomes after adjustment for age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, body mass index, and comorbidities. Former (vs never) smokers (n = 33 101) had higher adjusted odds of death (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.06-1.17) and ICU admission (aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.11). Among current smokers, NRT prescription was associated with reduced mortality (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.82). Vaccination effects were significantly moderated by smoking status; vaccination was more strongly associated with reduced mortality among current (aOR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16-0.66) and former smokers (aOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.39-0.57) than for never smokers (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57, 0.79). Vaccination was associated with reduced ICU admission more strongly among former (aOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.66-0.83) than never smokers (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Former but not current smokers hospitalized with COVID-19 are at higher risk for severe outcomes. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is associated with better hospital outcomes in COVID-19 patients, especially current and former smokers. NRT during COVID-19 hospitalization may reduce mortality for current smokers. IMPLICATIONS: Prior findings regarding associations between smoking and severe COVID-19 disease outcomes have been inconsistent. This large cohort study suggests potential beneficial effects of nicotine replacement therapy on COVID-19 outcomes in current smokers and outsized benefits of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in current and former smokers. Such findings may influence clinical practice and prevention efforts and motivate additional research that explores mechanisms for these effects.

4.
Rachel Gross; Tanayott Thaweethai; Erika B. Rosenzweig; James Chan; Lori B. Chibnik; Mine S. Cicek; Amy J. Elliott; Valerie J. Flaherman; Andrea S. Foulkes; Margot Gage Witvliet; Richard Gallagher; Maria Laura Gennaro; Terry L. Jernigan; Elizabeth W. Karlson; Stuart D. Katz; Patricia A. Kinser; Lawrence C. Kleinman; Michelle F. Lamendola-Essel; Joshua D. Milner; Sindhu Mohandas; Praveen C. Mudumbi; Jane W. Newburger; Kyung E. Rhee; Amy L. Salisbury; Jessica N. Snowden; Cheryl R. Stein; Melissa S. Stockwell; Kelan G. Tantisira; Moriah E. Thomason; Dongngan T. Truong; David Warburton; John C. Wood; Shifa Ahmed; Almary Akerlundh; Akram N. Alshawabkeh; Brett R. Anderson; Judy L. Aschner; Andrew M. Atz; Robin L. Aupperle; Fiona C. Baker; Venkataraman Balaraman; Dithi Banerjee; Deanna M. Barch; Arielle Baskin-Sommers; Sultana Bhuiyan; Marie-Abele C. Bind; Amanda L. Bogie; Natalie C. Buchbinder; Elliott Bueler; Hülya Bükülmez; B.J. Casey; Linda Chang; Duncan B. Clark; Rebecca G. Clifton; Katharine N. Clouser; Lesley Cottrell; Kelly Cowan; Viren D'sa; Mirella Dapretto; Soham Dasgupta; Walter Dehority; Kirsten B. Dummer; Matthew D. Elias; Shari Esquenazi-Karonika; Danielle N. Evans; E. Vincent S. Faustino; Alexander G. Fiks; Daniel Forsha; John J. Foxe; Naomi P. Friedman; Greta Fry; Sunanda Gaur; Dylan G. Gee; Kevin M. Gray; Ashraf S. Harahsheh; Andrew C. Heath; Mary M. Heitzeg; Christina M. Hester; Sophia Hill; Laura Hobart-Porter; Travis K.F. Hong; Carol R. Horowitz; Daniel S. Hsia; Matthew Huentelman; Kathy D. Hummel; William G. Iacono; Katherine Irby; Joanna Jacobus; Vanessa L. Jacoby; Pei-Ni Jone; David C. Kaelber; Tyler J. Kasmarcak; Matthew J. Kluko; Jessica S. Kosut; Angela R. Laird; Jeremy Landeo-Gutierrez; Sean M. Lang; Christine L. Larson; Peter Paul C. Lim; Krista M. Lisdahl; Brian W. McCrindle; Russell J. McCulloh; Alan L. Mendelsohn; Torri D. Metz; Lerraughn M. Morgan; Eva M. Müller-Oehring; Erica R. Nahin; Michael C. Neale; Manette Ness-Cochinwala; Sheila M. Nolan; Carlos R. Oliveira; Matthew E. Oster; Ronald M. Payne; Hengameh Raissy; Isabelle G. Randall; Suchitra Rao; Harrison T. Reeder; Johana M. Rosas; Mark W. Russell; Arash A. Sabati; Yamuna Sanil; Alice I. Sato; Michael S. Schechter; Rangaraj Selvarangan; Divya Shakti; Kavita Sharma; Lindsay M. Squeglia; Michelle D. Stevenson; Jacqueline Szmuszkovicz; Maria M. Talavera-Barber; Ronald J. Teufel; Deepika Thacker; Mmekom M. Udosen; Megan R. Warner; Sara E. Watson; Alan Werzberger; Jordan C. Weyer; Marion J. Wood; H. Shonna Yin; William T. Zempsky; Emily Zimmerman; Benard P. Dreyer; - RECOVER Initiative.
medrxiv; 2023.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2023.04.27.23289228

ABSTRACT

Importance: The prevalence, pathophysiology, and long-term outcomes of COVID-19 (post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 [PASC] or "Long COVID") in children and young adults remain unknown. Studies must address the urgent need to define PASC, its mechanisms, and potential treatment targets in children and young adults. Observations: We describe the protocol for the Pediatric Observational Cohort Study of the NIHs REsearching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Initiative. RECOVER-Pediatrics is an observational meta-cohort study of caregiver-child pairs (birth through 17 years) and young adults (18 through 25 years), recruited from more than 100 sites across the US. This report focuses on two of five cohorts that comprise RECOVER-Pediatrics: 1) a de novo RECOVER prospective cohort of children and young adults with and without previous or current infection; and 2) an extant cohort derived from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study (n=10,000). The de novo cohort incorporates three tiers of data collection: 1) remote baseline assessments (Tier 1, n=6000); 2) longitudinal follow-up for up to 4 years (Tier 2, n=6000); and 3) a subset of participants, primarily the most severely affected by PASC, who will undergo deep phenotyping to explore PASC pathophysiology (Tier 3, n=600). Youth enrolled in the ABCD study participate in Tier 1. The pediatric protocol was developed as a collaborative partnership of investigators, patients, researchers, clinicians, community partners, and federal partners, intentionally promoting inclusivity and diversity. The protocol is adaptive to facilitate responses to emerging science. Conclusions and Relevance: RECOVER-Pediatrics seeks to characterize the clinical course, underlying mechanisms, and long-term effects of PASC from birth through 25 years old. RECOVER-Pediatrics is designed to elucidate the epidemiology, four-year clinical course, and sociodemographic correlates of pediatric PASC. The data and biosamples will allow examination of mechanistic hypotheses and biomarkers, thus providing insights into potential therapeutic interventions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cognition Disorders
5.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 2022 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2243803

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is mixed evidence about the relations of current versus past cancer with severe COVID-19 outcomes and how they vary by patient and cancer characteristics. METHODS: Electronic health record data of 104,590 adult hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were obtained from 21 United States health systems from February 2020 through September 2021. In-hospital mortality and ICU admission were predicted from current and past cancer diagnoses. Moderation by patient characteristics, vaccination status, cancer type, and year of the pandemic was examined. RESULTS: 6.8% of the patients had current (n = 7,141) and 6.5% had past (n = 6,749) cancer diagnoses. Current cancer predicted both severe outcomes but past cancer did not; adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for mortality were 1.58 (95% CI: 1.46, 1.70) and 1.04 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.13), respectively. Mortality rates decreased over the pandemic but the incremental risk of current cancer persisted, with the increment being larger among younger vs. older patients. Prior COVID-19 vaccination reduced mortality generally and amongst those with current cancer (aOR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Current cancer, especially amongst younger patients, posed a substantially increased risk for death and ICU admission among COVID-19 patients; prior COVID-19 vaccination mitigated the risk associated with current cancer. Past history of cancer was not associated with higher risks for severe COVID-19 outcomes for most cancer types. IMPACT: This study clarifies the characteristics that modify the risk associated with cancer on severe COVID-19 outcomes across the first 20 months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

6.
Can Fam Physician ; 68(12): 874-879, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2164766
7.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 24(1): 25-33, 2023 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2161261

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe trends in critical illness from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that PICU admission rates were higher in the Omicron period compared with the original outbreak but that fewer patients needed endotracheal intubation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: This study took place in nine U.S. PICUs over 3 weeks in January 2022 (Omicron period) compared with 3 weeks in March 2020 (original period). PATIENTS: Patients less than or equal to 21 years old who screened positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection by polymerase chain reaction or hospital-based rapid antigen test and were admitted to a PICU or intermediate care unit were included. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 267 patients (239 Omicron and 28 original) were reviewed. Forty-five patients in the Omicron cohort had incidental SARS-CoV-2 and were excluded from analysis. The Omicron cohort patients were younger compared with the original cohort patients (median [interquartile range], 6 yr [1.3-13.3 yr] vs 14 yr [8.3-17.3 yr]; p = 0.001). The Omicron period, compared with the original period, was associated with an average increase in COVID-19-related PICU admissions of 13 patients per institution (95% CI, 6-36; p = 0.008), which represents a seven-fold increase in the absolute number admissions. We failed to identify an association between cohort period (Omicron vs original) and odds of intubation (odds ratio, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.3-1.7). However, we cannot exclude the possibility of up to 70% reduction in intubation. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19-related PICU admissions were seven times higher in the Omicron wave compared with the original outbreak. We could not exclude the possibility of up to 70% reduction in use of intubation in the Omicron versus original epoch, which may represent differences in PICU/hospital admission policy in the later period, or pattern of disease, or possibly the impact of vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Child , Humans , United States/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Pandemics , Critical Illness , Patient Acuity
8.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 21338, 2022 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2160313

ABSTRACT

Point-of-care antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) to detect Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) represent a scalable tool for surveillance of active SARS-CoV-2 infections in the population. Data on the performance of these tests in real-world community settings are paramount to guide their implementation to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the performance characteristics of the CareStart COVID-19 Antigen test (CareStart) in a community testing site in Holyoke, Massachusetts. We compared CareStart to a SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) reference, both using anterior nasal swab samples. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and the expected positive and negative predictive values at different SARS-CoV-2 prevalence estimates. We performed 666 total tests on 591 unique individuals. 573 (86%) were asymptomatic. There were 52 positive tests by RT-qPCR. The sensitivity of CareStart was 49.0% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 34.8-63.4) and specificity was 99.5% (95% CI 98.5-99.9). Among positive RT-qPCR tests, the median cycle threshold (Ct) was significantly lower in samples that tested positive on CareStart. Using a Ct ≤ 30 as a benchmark for positivity increased the sensitivity of the test to 64.9% (95% CI 47.5-79.8). Our study shows that CareStart has a high specificity and moderate sensitivity. The utility of RDTs, such as CareStart, in mass implementation should prioritize use cases in which a higher specificity is more important, such as triage tests to rule-in active infections in community surveillance programs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Pandemics , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , COVID-19 Testing
9.
Thorax ; 77(Suppl 1):A117, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2118247

ABSTRACT

IntroductionStarting secondary school is a big step for any child and their family but particularly so if they have a chronic condition such as cystic fibrosis (CF). Hospital teams can assist with the preparation required for the transition. CF is different from other chronic conditions with respect to holding transition events, as face to face events are not possible due to the risk of cross-infection of different organisms between patients. In order to overcome this, the CF team at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital created a virtual event named ‘MI7’ (Moving Into year 7).MethodEvents were held via video conferencing software and questionnaires sent to all participants before the event and afterwards. All patients in year 6 cared for by the Alder Hey CF network were invited to participate with a maximum of 7 young people per group. Packs were sent out beforehand. Sessions consisted of ice-breaker games and CF team led discissions.ResultsA pilot event was held in 2019. This was well-received and follow-up from the families was sought after the first term at secondary school. Unfortunately, due to the COVID pandemic, the event could not be held in 2020, but it went ahead in 2021 and 2022.There was a distinct difference between the event held in 2019 and 2021/22, in that everyone (the hospital team members, and the patients and their families) was much more familiar with participating in a virtual event, due to the way this practice had become commonplace during the COVID pandemic.Overall 22 people have participated in these events to date. 25% described being worried about going to secondary school. All young people gave at least one thing that they were worried about and the most common finding was getting lost (21%). The most common CF related worry was regarding taking creon and 12% cited this as a concern. Less than 25% of all concerns given related to CF with the remainder being more generic concerns.All participants stated that they enjoyed the event and most found it useful.ConclusionTransition events to help this patient population move from primary to secondary school are feasible, enjoyable for young people with CF and useful.

10.
PLoS One ; 17(9): e0274571, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2054344

ABSTRACT

MAIN OBJECTIVE: There is limited information on how patient outcomes have changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study characterizes changes in mortality, intubation, and ICU admission rates during the first 20 months of the pandemic. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: University of Wisconsin researchers collected and harmonized electronic health record data from 1.1 million COVID-19 patients across 21 United States health systems from February 2020 through September 2021. The analysis comprised data from 104,590 adult hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Inclusion criteria for the analysis were: (1) age 18 years or older; (2) COVID-19 ICD-10 diagnosis during hospitalization and/or a positive COVID-19 PCR test in a 14-day window (+/- 7 days of hospital admission); and (3) health system contact prior to COVID-19 hospitalization. Outcomes assessed were: (1) mortality (primary), (2) endotracheal intubation, and (3) ICU admission. RESULTS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The 104,590 hospitalized participants had a mean age of 61.7 years and were 50.4% female, 24% Black, and 56.8% White. Overall risk-standardized mortality (adjusted for age, sex, race, ethnicity, body mass index, insurance status and medical comorbidities) declined from 16% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients (95% CI: 16% to 17%) early in the pandemic (February-April 2020) to 9% (CI: 9% to 10%) later (July-September 2021). Among subpopulations, males (vs. females), those on Medicare (vs. those on commercial insurance), the severely obese (vs. normal weight), and those aged 60 and older (vs. younger individuals) had especially high mortality rates both early and late in the pandemic. ICU admission and intubation rates also declined across these 20 months. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality, intubation, and ICU admission rates improved markedly over the first 20 months of the pandemic among adult hospitalized COVID-19 patients although gains varied by subpopulation. These data provide important information on the course of COVID-19 and identify hospitalized patient groups at heightened risk for negative outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04506528 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04506528).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Intensive Care Units , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal , Male , Medicare , Middle Aged , Pandemics , United States/epidemiology
11.
Ann N Y Acad Sci ; 2022 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2052884

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic caught the world largely unprepared, including scientific and policy communities. On April 10-13, 2022, researchers across academia, industry, government, and nonprofit organizations met at the Keystone symposium "Lessons from the Pandemic: Responding to Emerging Zoonotic Viral Diseases" to discuss the successes and challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and what lessons can be applied moving forward. Speakers focused on experiences not only from the COVID-19 pandemic but also from outbreaks of other pathogens, including the Ebola virus, Lassa virus, and Nipah virus. A general consensus was that investments made during the COVID-19 pandemic in infrastructure, collaborations, laboratory and manufacturing capacity, diagnostics, clinical trial networks, and regulatory enhancements-notably, in low-to-middle income countries-must be maintained and strengthened to enable quick, concerted responses to future threats, especially to zoonotic pathogens.

12.
Sci Transl Med ; 14(641): eabn6150, 2022 04 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1807307

ABSTRACT

Breakthrough infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants have been reported frequently in vaccinated individuals with waning immunity. In particular, a cluster of over 1000 infections with the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant was identified in a predominantly fully vaccinated population in Provincetown, Massachusetts in July 2021. In this study, vaccinated individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 16) demonstrated substantially higher serum antibody responses than vaccinated individuals who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 23), including 32-fold higher binding antibody titers and 31-fold higher neutralizing antibody titers against the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant. Vaccinated individuals who tested positive also showed higher mucosal antibody responses in nasal secretions and higher spike protein-specific CD8+ T cell responses in peripheral blood than did vaccinated individuals who tested negative. These data demonstrate that fully vaccinated individuals developed robust anamnestic antibody and T cell responses after infection with the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant. Moreover, these findings suggest that population immunity will likely increase over time by a combination of widespread vaccination and breakthrough infections.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Viral , Antibody Formation , Humans
13.
medrxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.04.01.22273252

ABSTRACT

Background: South Asians represent the largest non-white ethnic group in Canada. The Greater Toronto Area (GTA), home to a high proportion of South Asians, emerged as a COVID-19 hot spot. Early in the pandemic, the South Asian community was identified as having risk factors for exposure and specific barriers to accessing testing and reliable health information, rendering them uniquely vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Objectives: To investigate the burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection among South Asians in the GTA, and to determine which demographic characteristics were most closely aligned with seropositivity, in this cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort study. Methods: Participants from the GTA were enrolled between April and July 2021. Seropositivity for anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid antibodies was determined from dried blood spots, and age and sex standardized to the Ontario South Asian population. Demographics, risk perceptions, and sources of COVID-19 information were collected via questionnaire in a subset. Results: Among the 916 South Asians enrolled, mean age 41 years, the age and sex standardized seropositivity was 23.6% (95% CI: 20.8%-26.4%). Approximately one-third identified as essential workers, and 19% reported living in a multi-generational household. Over half perceived high COVID-19 risk due to their geographic location, and 36% due to their type of employment. The top three most trusted sources of COVID-related information included healthcare providers/public health, traditional media sources, and social media. Conclusion: By the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, approximately one-quarter of a sample of South Asians in Ontario had serologic evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Insight into factors that render certain populations at risk can help future pandemic planning and disease control efforts.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
14.
Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology ; 127(5):S44-S45, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1734156

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In January 2020, Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Allergen Powder-dnfp (PTAH) became the first treatment for Peanut Allergy (PA) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The adoption of innovative new therapies requires consideration of the skills, logistics and practicalities required for implementation. Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted to explore health care providers’ (HCPs) experiences of delivering PTAH, challenges encountered, and successful implementation strategies. HCPs who had initiated PTAH treatment with ≥3 patients since FDA approval were eligible. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via videoconference. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis. The study was exempted by the Western Institutional Review Board. Results: Eight allergists and three nurse practitioners participated. Their experiences are characterized by four key themes: 1. factors influencing adoption, 2. factors related to delivering the treatment in everyday practice, 3. learnings and reflections, and 4. delivering PTAH during the COVID-19 pandemic. HCPs described how successful implementation of PTAH requires them to be thoughtful about their clinic’s abilities to integrate complex, time-consuming treatments into their practice. Prior experience of oral immunotherapy was deemed beneficial, but not essential for implementation and learning from others’ experience was suggested as a way of helping new prescribers overcome perceived and actual implementation challenges. Conclusion: The experiences described by the treatment pioneers included in this research serve to benefit the wider allergy community by providing practical solutions, successful implementation strategies and opportunities to share information as new innovative treatments become available to patients.

15.
Pediatrics ; 149(5)2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1674088

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mandatory quarantine upon exposure to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) results in a substantial number of lost days of school. We hypothesized that implementation of a state-wide test-to-stay (TTS) program would allow more students to participate in in-person learning, and not cause additional clusters of COVID-19 cases due to in-school transmission. METHODS: For the 2020-2021 academic year, Massachusetts implemented an opt-in TTS program, in which students exposed to COVID-19 in school are tested each school day with a rapid antigen test. If negative, students may participate in school-related activities that day. Testing occurs daily for a duration of 7 calendar days after exposure. Here, we report the results from the first 13 weeks of the program. RESULTS: A total of 2298 schools signed up for TTS, and 504 167 individuals out of a total population of 860 457 consented. During the first 13 weeks with complete data, 1959 schools activated the program at least once for 102 373 individual, exposed students. Out of 328 271 tests performed, 2943 positive cases were identified (per person positivity rate, 2.9%, 95% confidence interval, 2.8-3.0). A minimum of 325 328 and a maximum of 497 150 days of in-person school were saved through participation in the program. CONCLUSIONS: Daily, rapid on-site antigen testing is a safe and feasible alternative to mandatory quarantine and can be used to maximize safe in-person learning time during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Quarantine , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Schools
16.
Nat Med ; 28(5): 1083-1094, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1671607

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has demonstrated a clear need for high-throughput, multiplexed and sensitive assays for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other respiratory viruses and their emerging variants. Here, we present a cost-effective virus and variant detection platform, called microfluidic Combinatorial Arrayed Reactions for Multiplexed Evaluation of Nucleic acids (mCARMEN), which combines CRISPR-based diagnostics and microfluidics with a streamlined workflow for clinical use. We developed the mCARMEN respiratory virus panel to test for up to 21 viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, other coronaviruses and both influenza strains, and demonstrated its diagnostic-grade performance on 525 patient specimens in an academic setting and 166 specimens in a clinical setting. We further developed an mCARMEN panel to enable the identification of 6 SARS-CoV-2 variant lineages, including Delta and Omicron, and evaluated it on 2,088 patient specimens with near-perfect concordance to sequencing-based variant classification. Lastly, we implemented a combined Cas13 and Cas12 approach that enables quantitative measurement of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A viral copies in samples. The mCARMEN platform enables high-throughput surveillance of multiple viruses and variants simultaneously, enabling rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza, Human , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , Microfluidics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
17.
Blood ; 138:1894, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1582194

ABSTRACT

[Formula presented] Background: Adult sickle cell patients on chronic transfusion therapy (CTT) garnered special concern during the COVID-19 pandemic, when mass cancellation of blood drives threatened the national blood supply. In response, the American Society of Hematology proposed several strategies to decrease blood utilization, while maintaining adequate disease control for sickle cell patients on CTT. These included targeting a higher end hemoglobin S%, switching patients to simple transfusions when appropriate, and transitioning to alternative disease modifying therapies. There is little evidence to support the safety of altering exchange therapy regimens. Accordingly, at the Johns Hopkins Sickle Cell Center for Adults, a multidisciplinary team of clinicians and transfusion medicine specialists evaluated patients on a case by case basis to determine how their exchanges could be modified to accommodate for anticipated blood supply shortages. We describe our blood conservation efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting clinical outcomes for adult patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA). Methods: For inclusion in this IRB-approved retrospective study, patients received at least 7 monthly exchange transfusions between March 2019 and February 2020 and continued care through March 2021. Decisions regarding CTT were made prior to data collection. Modifications to chronic exchanges included increasing the fraction of cells remaining (FCR), decreasing the end hematocrit, or switching to a hemodilution method. Additionally, select patients transitioned to monthly simple transfusions if they were clinically stable, had a hemoglobin ≤ 7 g/dL, and had a persistently suppressed hemoglobin S% (≤ 30). We collected basic demographics, pre-exchange laboratory studies, and exchange parameters before and after each transfusion encounter in the year before (March 2019 - February 2020) and during (March 2020 - February 2021) the COVID-19 pandemic. Lastly, we recorded presentations to urgent care and the emergency department;and hospital admissions during each time period. We reported descriptive statistics for the cohort and compared outcomes using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann Whitney U test. We analyzed data using Stata/SE Version 16.1. Results: We identified 58 patients with SCA who qualified for inclusion (Table 1). Fifty-three patients remained on chronic exchange transfusions during the pandemic, and five were switched to simple transfusions. For patients who remained on chronic exchanges, most received conventional automated red cell exchange (RCE) prior to (85%) and during the pandemic (77%). Use of hemodilution increased (15% to 23% of patients). Forty-three patients experienced an increase in mean FCR (33.6 (SD 11.6) vs 37.7 (4.7), p =.00). Of those, 22 patients saw a concomitant decrease in mean end hematocrit (30.8 (1.7) vs 29.6 (1.1), p =.00). These changes resulted in a decline in the average number of units per procedure (8.6 (1.9) vs 7.3 (1.7), p =.00), which corresponded to 890 units conserved. Mean pre-transfusion hemoglobin values declined (9.4 (1.3) vs 9.2 (1.3), p = 0.01), but hemoglobin S%, reticulocyte count, and ferritin values were unchanged (p > 0.05). Acute care presentations and hospital admissions declined, which were likely spurred by concerns about COVID-19 infection (Table 2, p < 0.05). During the pandemic, three patients died, one of whom had been switched to simple transfusions. This patient experienced a consistent rise in hemoglobin S% until death. Two of the remaining patients on simple transfusions were switched back to automated RCE due to an increase in hemoglobin S% above goal (Figure 1). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we conserved red blood cell units through expanded use of hemodilution, higher FCR values, and switching some patients to simple transfusions. Patients who remained on exchanges maintained hemoglobin S% values near a goal of 30% without increasing iron burden. In contrast, the majority of patients who were switched to simple transfusions were unable to maintain goal hematologic parameters, and one patient died. Our data suggest that in a blood shortage crisis, changing the exchange procedure itself may be the safest means of conserving blood in a population of adult sickle cell patients;however longer follow-up is needed to ensure that these changes are safe. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Lanzkron: GBT: Research Funding;Shire: Research Funding;Novo Nordisk: Consultancy;CSL Behring: Research Funding;Pfizer: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company;Teva: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company;Novartis: Research Funding;Imara: Research Funding;Bluebird Bio: Consultancy.

18.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): 1693-1695, 2021 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1501057

ABSTRACT

We describe 3 instances of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission despite medical masks and eye protection, including transmission despite the source person being masked, transmission despite the exposed person being masked, and transmission despite both parties being masked. Whole genome sequencing confirmed perfect homology between source and exposed persons' viruses in all cases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Masks
19.
Soc Sci Q ; 102(6): 2482-2498, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1488269

ABSTRACT

Objective: We investigate how beliefs about scientists and presidents affect views about two pandemics, Zika virus (2016) and COVID-19 (2020). Methods: Three New Hampshire surveys in 2016 and 2020 provide data to test how beliefs about scientists' practices and presidential approval relate to pandemic views. Results: Support for presidents consistently predicts perceptions of scientists' integrity and trust in science agencies for information, but the directionality changes from 2016 to 2020-increased trust among Obama-supporters; decreased trust among Trump-supporters. Respondents who believe scientists lack objectivity are also less likely to trust science agencies during both Zika and COVID-19 and are less apt to be confident in the government's response in 2016. Assessments of pandemic responses become increasingly political during 2020; most notably, support for President Trump strongly predicts confidence in the government's efforts. Conclusion: Results highlight how beliefs about scientists' practices and presidents are central to the science-politics nexus during pandemics.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL